Hale v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ontracts generally may be subject to rescission on a finding of fraud, duress, undue influence, or negligent misrepresentation in their making.” (citing Vincent v. Palmer, 19 A.2d 183, 188 (Md. 1941))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fultz v. Shaffer
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-29· cited 44×
• Young v. Anne Arundel County
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-11· cited 29×
• Hale v. Hale
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-06· cited 23×
• Boyds Civic Ass'n v. Montgomery County Council
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-06-27· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reyes v. Prince George's County
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-31· cited 120×
• Tanner v. McKeldin
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-06-12· cited 71×
• Hamilton v. McAuliffe
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-22· cited 58×
• Harford County v. Schultz
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-04-05· cited 39×
• Patuxent Oil Co. v. County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-03-15· cited 37×
• Eckstein v. Eckstein
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-12· cited 30×
• Anne Arundel County v. Ebersberger
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-15· cited 13×
• Coffman v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-11-18· cited 7×
• Rowe v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-11· cited 1×