First Circuit· 7/9/2010

Hakim v. Holder

Citations

611 F.3d 73
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14009
2010 WL 2698613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

assuming “arguendo ” that the court had jurisdiction and declining to exercise it for prudential reasons
“the Department of Homeland Security . . . commenced removal proceedings against Hakim by filing a [NTA] with the Immigration Court”
“We thus need not address whether a BIA order denying relief from removal and remanding for consideration of voluntary departure is a final order of removal.”
“That rule amended the voluntary departure regulation, which now, in part, provides that a grant of voluntary departure on or after January 20, 2009, automati- cally terminates with the filing of a petition for review.”
“That rule amended the voluntary departure regulation, which now, in part, provides that a grant of voluntary departure on or after January 20, 2009, automati- cally terminates with the filing of a petition for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Souter, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.