Hakim v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming “arguendo ” that the court had jurisdiction and declining to exercise it for prudential reasons
• “the Department of Homeland Security . . . commenced removal proceedings against Hakim by filing a [NTA] with the Immigration Court”
• “We thus need not address whether a BIA order denying relief from removal and remanding for consideration of voluntary departure is a final order of removal.”
• “That rule amended the voluntary departure regulation, which now, in part, provides that a grant of voluntary departure on or after January 20, 2009, automati- cally terminates with the filing of a petition for review.”
• “That rule amended the voluntary departure regulation, which now, in part, provides that a grant of voluntary departure on or after January 20, 2009, automati- cally terminates with the filing of a petition for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).