· 6/25/2009
Chupina v. Holder
Citations
- 570 F.3d 99
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13660
- 2009 WL 1796076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a removal order would not be final until withholding proceedings concluded after remand
- recognizing that only upon “the earlier of the BIA’s affirmance of the immigration judge’s order of removal or the expiration of the time to appeal the immigration judge’s order of removal to the BIA” will a removal order become final and subject to judicial review
- “An order of removal is ‘final’ upon ... the BIA’s affirmance of the immigration judge’s order of removal.... ”
- “An order of removal is ‘final’ upon . . . the BIA’s affirmance of the immigration judge’s order of removal . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miner, Katzmann, Raggi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.