Mayra Holguin-Mendoza v. Loretta Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that AS 12.55.027 “sets out criteria for determining whether a defendant’s time in treatment qualifies for jail credit”
• “Thus, probation violations are not new ‘offenses,’ separate and independent from one another and from the underlying criminal conviction. Rather, probation revocations relate back to the underlying criminal offense[.]”
• “[P]robation revocations relate back to the underlying criminal offense, constituting ‘continuing punishment for the crime for which probation was originally imposed.’” (quoting Demientieff v. State, 814 P.2d 745, 747 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).