Federal Circuit· 2/23/2007
Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, Plc
Citations
- 479 F.3d 1313
- 81 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1900
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3926
- 2007 WL 542697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although an applicant had the right to refile and attempt to broaden the claims, an applicant cannot recapture claim scope that was surren- dered
- “‘Anticipation’ means that the claimed invention was previously known, and that all of the elements and limitations of the claim are described in a single prior art reference.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michel, Newman, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 248×
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Federal Circuit· 2008-10-07· cited 112×
- Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-07-14· cited 88×
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionFederal Circuit· 2011-08-24· cited 59×
- ORION IP, LLC v. Hyundai Motor AmericaFederal Circuit· 2010-05-17· cited 48×
- Ca, Inc. v. Simple. Com, Inc.E.D. New York· 2009-03-05· cited 15×
- Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regents of the UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-04-24· cited 13×
- Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2011-04-04· cited 9×
- Tgip, Inc. v. at & T Corp.E.D. Texas· 2007-03-12· cited 3×
- iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-12-11· cited 2×
- Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 2009-10-14· cited 2×
- POZEN INC. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2011-08-05· cited 2×
- Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp.S.D. Ohio· 2009-09-08· cited 2×
- Paradox Security Systems Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2008-12-23· cited 2×
- Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Jackel International Ltd.E.D. Texas· 2015-07-20· cited 2×
- Morningware, Inc. v. Hearthware Home Products, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2012-09-26· cited 1×
- MiTile, Ltd. v. Hasbro, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2013-10-30· cited 1×
- Everything Baseball v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.N.D. Illinois· 2009-05-04
- Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Fortress Iron, LpFederal Circuit· 2025-10-17
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court· 1926-10-11· cited 1,033×
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCFederal Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 435×
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 262×
- Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. DavisSupreme Court· 1880-11-29· cited 147×
- Yolanda R. CASTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Postmaster General Anthony M. FRANK, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1995-11-27· cited 79×
- Springs Window Fashions Lp, Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc. v. Novo Industries, L.P., Defendant-Cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 77×
- Akzo N.V. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionFederal Circuit· 1986-12-22· cited 55×
- Crawford v. HeysingerSupreme Court· 1887-12-12· cited 45×
- Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Raytek Corp.Federal Circuit· 2003-07-07· cited 37×
Other cases named Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, Plc
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.