Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 2/23/2007

Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, Plc

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 1313
  • 81 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1900
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3926
  • 2007 WL 542697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although an applicant had the right to refile and attempt to broaden the claims, an applicant cannot recapture claim scope that was surren- dered
  • “‘Anticipation’ means that the claimed invention was previously known, and that all of the elements and limitations of the claim are described in a single prior art reference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Newman, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.