amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party must show at least a likelihood of success and irreparable harm to receive preliminary injunctive relief
• holding that a plaintiff must establish likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
• noting that both \case law and logic\ establish the likelihood of success on the merits and the irreparable harm factors as necessary showings to obtain a preliminary injunction
• stating that “[a] claim must be construed before determining its validity just as it is first construed before deciding infringement”
• stating that “[a] claim must be construed before determining its validity just as it is first construed before deciding infringement”
• noting that “the claim scope is first determined” and then “an invalidity analysis” is conducted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

224 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 174×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 174×
• Wyers v. Master Lock Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 165×
• Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del Vecchio
  Federal Circuit· 2003-01-09· cited 165×
• Linc Government Services, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-11-05· cited 159×
• In Re Seagate Technology, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2007-08-20· cited 147×
• Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-02-07· cited 145×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-10-21· cited 141×
• Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-15· cited 136×
• ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-11-01· cited 123×
• Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-12-08· cited 121×
• Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-13· cited 119×
• Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Ab
  Federal Circuit· 2004-09-13· cited 115×
• Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-01-09· cited 112×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-06-22· cited 107×
• Pandrol Usa, Lp and Pandrol Limited v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. Mediavilla
  Federal Circuit· 2003-02-21· cited 107×
• Michael L. McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2001-08-21· cited 88×
• Altana Pharma AG v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-14· cited 83×
• Procter & Gamble Co. v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-05· cited 80×
• Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro Company
  Federal Circuit· 2017-02-16· cited 76×

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1989-01-19· cited 325×
• Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game Technology
  Federal Circuit· 1999-09-17· cited 317×
• Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott Laboratories
  Federal Circuit· 1988-06-17· cited 314×
• Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 283×
• White v. Dunbar
  Supreme Court· 1886-11-15· cited 270×
• Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corporation and Elan Corporation, Plc
  Federal Circuit· 2000-05-12· cited 226×
• Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-08-15· cited 195×
• H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-05-27· cited 175×
• Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson and Personal Products Company
  Federal Circuit· 1984-10-09· cited 171×
• Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company v. Altek Systems, and Keystone Jackets, Inc. And George Wrabel
  Federal Circuit· 1998-01-06· cited 170×
• Nutrition 21 v. The United States of America v. Thorne Research, Inc., Albert F. Czap
  Federal Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 168×
• Helifix Limited v. Blok-Lok, Ltd. And William Scott Burns v. Helifix North America Corporation, Third Party Counterclaim
  Third Circuit· 2000-04-07· cited 166×
• Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Barnes-Hind/hydrocurve, Inc., and Barnes-Hind International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-07-14· cited 131×
• Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-04-16· cited 107×
• Jerome H. Lemelson v. General Mills, Inc., General Mills Fun Group, Inc., Marvin Glass & Associates, and Mattel, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-11· cited 105×
• Atlas Powder Company v. Ireco Chemicals
  Federal Circuit· 1985-09-23· cited 95×
• Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc., and David G. Kraenzle
  Federal Circuit· 1997-06-19· cited 84×
• In Re John R. Beattie
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-04· cited 72×