Ca, Inc. v. Simple. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he mere theoretical possibility that the archive CD could have been altered does not make it inadmissible”
• in the absence of objections, “the Special Master's findings of fact or legal conclusions will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous” (citing Benicorp, 447 F. Supp. 2d at 331; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b))
• Some portions of the R&R have not been objected to or argued against by the parties As to those unless expressly stated otherwise the Court 3 review has been for clear error and, having found none, those portions are adopted ’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).