Skip to main content

Hailey v. Hailey

Citations

  • 176 S.W.3d 374
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 7782
  • 2004 WL 1902527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we presume that trial court properly exercised its discretion in dividing marital estate
  • providing that a trial court is required to consider offsetting benefits when a party requests such relief
  • defining “estate of the parties,” for purposes of predecessor to section 7.001, as community property only, thus excluding parties’ separate property
  • noting trial court may offset claims for reimbursement against each other
  • to calculate claim for economic contribution to separate property there must be evidence of: (1
  • considering education and relative earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elsa Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.