Skip to main content
· 7/25/2008

Bufkin v. Bufkin

Citations

  • 259 S.W.3d 343
  • 2008 WL 2584495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff did not plead for prejudgment interest where the request was not specifically listed and the plaintiff generally prayed for “such other and further relief, general or special, legal or equitable, to which she may show herself justly entitled to receive”
  • observing that appellate court has discretion to deem issues waived due to inadequate briefing
  • holding no prejudgment interest was requested where it was not listed specifically and the party generally prayed for “such other and further relief, general or special, legal or equitable, to which she may show herself justly entitled to receive”
  • discussing “long-standing rule” that point may be waived due to inadequate briefing
  • discussing ―long-standing rule‖ that point may be waived due to inadequate briefing
  • discussing “long-standing rule” that point may be waived due to inadequate briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill, Richter, Lang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.