Harford County v. Saks Fifth Avenue Distribution Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “pre-judgment interest shall be calculated at the legal rate of six percent per annum.”
• “[T]he Legislature is presumed to have meant what it said and said what it meant.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• \[W]e will not read into the statute words that give it an interpretation that limits or extends its application beyond the words the Legislature used\
• “[W]e will not read into the statute words that give it an interpretation that limits or extends its application beyond the words the Legislature used”
• In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, “we seek to determine whether any material facts are in dispute and, if they are, we resolve them in favor of the non-moving party.”
• In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, “we seek to determine whether any material facts are in dispute and, if they are, we resolve them in favor of the non-moving party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).