D. Maryland· 8/20/2013
Clarke v. DynCorp International LLC
Citations
- 962 F. Supp. 2d 781
- 2013 WL 4495817
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117546
- 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a “lapse of as little as two months between the protected activity and an adverse employment action” weakens the inference of causality
- “[A] lapse of as little as two months between the protected activity and an adverse employment action is sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation.”
- “[A] lapse of as little as two months between the protected activity and an adverse employment action is ‘sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation.’”
- “[A] lapse of as little as two months between the protected activity and an adverse employment action is sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation.”
- “Because Clarke failed to file a civil suit during the 90-day period indicated in the right-to-sue letter issued in response to his 2006 charge of discrimination, he cannot now make claims based on the allegations in that charge.”
- “[A] lapse of as little as two months between the protected activity and an adverse employment action is ‘sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation.’” (quoting King v. Rumsfeld, 328 F.3d 145, 151 n.5 (4th Cir. 2003))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroFourth Circuit· 1999-05-14· cited 2,842×
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-03-11· cited 2,110×
- Francis v. GiacomelliFourth Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 1,790×
- Philips v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalFourth Circuit· 2009-07-13· cited 1,709×
- Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationFourth Circuit· 2006-09-22· cited 1,036×
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 958×
- David Wayne Evans v. B.F. Perkins CompanyFourth Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 956×
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersFourth Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 801×
- Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyFourth Circuit· 2003-03-26· cited 781×
- Dorn B. Holland v. Washington Homes, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 681×
- Gloria W. DOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY, Defendant-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1998-06-03· cited 662×
- Fayetteville Investors v. Commercial Builders, Incorporated American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1991-07-11· cited 602×
- Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National BankFirst Circuit· 2000-01-19· cited 498×
Other cases named Clarke v. DynCorp International LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.