Skip to main content

Desilets v. Desilets

Citations

  • 377 So. 2d 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imputing previously earned income to husband whose testimony showed his ability to earn that amount
  • imputing income for purposes of alimony based on capability to earn more by use of best efforts
  • taking judicial notice of rise in cost of living but also noting expert testimony that was introduced on this subject
  • where income is properly imputed, an award of alimony entirely exhausting the husband's actual income may be a proper exercise of the trial court's discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Desilets v. Desilets

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.