Guzman-Ruiz v. Hernandez-Colon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s denial of a Rule 56(f) continuance where “there was no diligence exercised during the three months . . . after the motion for summary judgment surfaced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).