Skip to main content
· 6/3/2005

City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.

Citations

  • 279 Kan. 799
  • 112 P.3d 125
  • 2005 Kan. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining this rationale, as incorporated into PIK instruction addressing treatment of expert opinion testimony
  • finding \ '[a]dmissions against interest made by a party are the strongest kind of evidence' \
  • “ ‘Admissions against interest made by a party are the strongest kind of evidence and override other factors.’ ”
  • “there can be no doubt that a landowner’s opinion of his or her property value is relevant in an eminent domain action”
  • “’Admissions against interest made by a party are the strongest kind of evidence and override other factors.’”
  • \'Admissions against interest made by a party are the strongest kind of evidence and override other factors.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.