M.D. Tennessee· 8/17/1984
Groseclose Ex Rel. Harries v. Dutton
Citations
- 594 F. Supp. 949
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the judgment of this Court, the con- ditions of confinement inflicted on Mr. Harries are so adverse that they have caused him to waive his post-conviction remedies involuntarily”
- “In the judgment of this Court, the conditions of confinement inflicted on Mr. Harries are so adverse that they have caused him to waive his post- conviction remedies involuntarily”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John T. Nixon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Paul Dennis Reid, Jr. v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-01-24· cited 81×
- Robert Charles Comer v. Terry L. Stewart, Director, Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2000-06-06· cited 44×
- Robert Charles Comer v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, of Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2007-03-15· cited 38×
- Harries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-07-30· cited 35×
- Naruto v. David SlaterNinth Circuit· 2018-04-23· cited 35×
- Pike v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2005-05-12· cited 31×
- William Groseclose v. Michael DuttonSixth Circuit· 1987-11-03· cited 29×
- Groseclose v. DuttonSixth Circuit· 1986-04-14· cited 28×
- Corcoran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-11· cited 24×
- Comer v. StewartD. Arizona· 2002-10-16· cited 20×
- Groseclose v. DuttonM.D. Tennessee· 1985-05-24· cited 17×
- Robert Charles Comer v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, of Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 16×
- SMITH BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. ArmontroutW.D. Missouri· 1986-04-05· cited 12×
- Smith by and Through Smith v. ArmontroutW.D. Missouri· 1985-01-31· cited 8×
- Corcoran v. BussN.D. Indiana· 2007-04-09· cited 8×
- Smith v. ArmontroutSecond Circuit· 1987-04-08· cited 7×
- Ex Parte Ray-ElCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-07-23· cited 6×
- Brewer v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1993-06-22· cited 5×
- Wilson v. LaneS.D. Illinois· 1988-04-19· cited 4×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 1,359×
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 1,092×
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 281×
Other cases named Groseclose Ex Rel. Harries v. Dutton
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.