Grinnell College v. Osborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeal of entry of judgment on workers’ compensation award and denial of stay pending judicial review was moot after the judicial review proceeding concluded with affirmance of the award
• recognizing the desirability of an authoritative adjudication to guide public officials in their future conduct
• noting that controversies arising from the interplay between Iowa Code section 17A.19(5) and Iowa Code section 86.42 would continue to evade review in the absence of an authoritative adjudication by this court
• applying a section 17A.19(5) analysis in de ciding whether the district court should have stayed a monetary award made by the workers’ compensation commissioner
• “The process sought to establish an administrative tribunal that would provide for the prompt and efficient determination and award of compensation to injured workers.”
• “It is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).