Rhiner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “revocation occurs by operation of law” when 1 See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970
• noting there is a statutory mandate for revocation after sentencing for a new offense
• “Issues of constitutional dimension ... are reviewed de novo.” (citing Ledezma v. State, 626 N.W.2d 134, 141 (Iowa 2001))
• where a problem is likely to reoccur, the court can decide to reach the merits of a controversy even though the case is moot
• “[Cjourts do not decide cases when the underlying controversy is moot.”
• “[C]ourts do not decide cases when the underlying controversy is moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).