Meier v. SENECAUT III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to preserve error on appeal where the trial court fails to rule, a motion requesting a ruling is required to preserve error
• finding that a party must request a ruling from the district court to preserve error for appeal on an issue presented but not decided
• finding that a party must request a ruling from the district court to preserve error for appeal on an issue presented but not decided
• recognizing a claim must normally be both raised and decided by the district court before it is preserved for our review
• explaining that a motion under the precursor to rule 1.904(2) is not designed as a replacement of the requirement to preserve error
• holding defendant waived appellate review of issue not reached by the court when defendant failed to renew his request for a ruling on that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).