Grimaldo v. Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that misconduct complaints that post- dated the action “could be relevant to [the] case and should be disclosed”
• noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”
• noting that the information sought \need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable\
• noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”
• noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”
• noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).