Brever v. Rockwell International Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff could still make out deterrence claim despite fact that she actually did testify
• holding that a court “should dismiss with leave to amend . . . if it is at all possible that the party against whom the dismissal is directed can correct the defect in the pleading or state a claim for relief”
• “We do not require district courts to engage in independent research or read the minds of litigants to determine if information justifying an amendment exists.”
• district courts are not required “to engage in independent research or read the minds of litigants to determine if information justifying an amendment exists.”
• “more than mere eonelusory allegations are required to state a valid claim”
• “[W]here the record clearly reflects that the non-moving party possesses additional facts necessary for an amendment and where that party has repeatedly expressed a willingness to amend, the court should reserve to the non-movant leave to amend upon dismissal of the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).