W.D. Washington· 1/17/2003
Ali v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 213 F.R.D. 390
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2042
- 2003 WL 245587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “there is no question that Petitioners meet standing requirements because they are parties to the suit”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pechman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ali v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2003-09-17· cited 39×
- Keyse G. Jama v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceEighth Circuit· 2003-05-27· cited 28×
- Moallin v. CangemiD. Minnesota· 2006-04-12· cited 8×
- Abdulle v. GonzalesW.D. Texas· 2006-03-28· cited 5×
- Keyse G. Jama v. INSEighth Circuit· 2003-05-27
- Ali v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2004-04-28
- Ali v. GonzalesNinth Circuit· 2006-11-30
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 3,847×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court· 1973-02-28· cited 2,787×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,888×
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court· 1987-03-24· cited 1,688×
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court· 1999-02-24· cited 1,485×
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court· 1804-02-22· cited 400×
- Mark Brittingham v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1992-12-23· cited 346×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1998-09-18· cited 321×
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1964-03-26· cited 282×
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesNinth Circuit· 1973-12-07· cited 267×
- Mary Jane Forbush v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Pension PlanFifth Circuit· 1993-06-25· cited 215×
- Walters v. RenoNinth Circuit· 1998-05-18· cited 215×
- L. Mets Lerwill, Charles M. Perry, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Employees of Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc. v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1978-09-27· cited 191×
- United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-Op Cecil A. Schell Edward Sewall Marvin KleynNinth Circuit· 1987-11-27· cited 182×
- Tefel v. RenoEleventh Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 145×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.