Griffin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the disputed impeaching cross-examination “had no relevance to the central issue concerning the guilt or innocence of the Appellant”
• finding no abuse of discretion in excluding testimony, as collateral, where offered solely to contradict a witness's testimony on an immaterial fact, and not to establish bias, corruption, or lack of competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baucham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-24· cited 6×
• Tripoli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-29· cited 6×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-14· cited 3×
• Jeancharles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-06· cited 3×
• Eaton Corp. v. Votour
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-07· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter Demopoulos
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-02-18· cited 193×
• United States v. Ronald Jarrett
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-06-08· cited 69×
• United States v. Terrance L. Payne
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-03-12· cited 62×
• Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-15· cited 52×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-04· cited 31×
• Strasser v. Yalamanchi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-28· cited 20×
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-08· cited 19×
• Faucher v. RCF DEVELOPERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 16×