Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that JCC may reject medical testimony if the JCC finds worker gave untruthful history
• recognizing that findings regarding work restrictions must be upheld if supported by the evidence
• recognizing that findings regarding work restrictions must be upheld if supported by the evidence
• recognizing that findings regarding work restrictions must be upheld if supported by the evidence
• holding JCC’s findings of fact must be upheld if any view of the evidence and its permissible inferences supports them
• recognizing the appellate court’s role “to guard against fanciful or arbitrary abuse of discretion in workers’ compensation cases, . . . by scrutinizing JCC findings under the light of the basic rule requiring competent substantial evidence in support of [its] findings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).