Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 606 So. 2d 641
  • 1992 WL 217181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that when character evidence is offered to prove the reasonableness of the defendant's apprehension, prior knowledge of the specific acts of violence is necessary
  • recognizing that when character evidence is offered to prove the reasonableness of the defendant’s apprehension, prior knowledge of the specific acts of violence is necessary
  • holding that the exclusion of a witness who would have testified regarding the character of the victim was harmful because the testimony went to the defendant's only defense of self-defense
  • reversing trial court's exclusion of proffered testimony relating to specific instances of violence by the victim
  • “Considering the nature of the evidence in this case, especially the conflicts between the theories offered by the two sides and the fact that the erroneously excluded evidence went to appellant’s only defense, the error must be considered harmful.”
  • substantive use of a deposition taken solely for the purpose of discovery is improper under section 90.804(2)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.