Holeton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discrepancies between victim’s statements to police and trial testimony go to weight of testimony and witness credibility and do not render testimony inherently contradictory
• explaining that a victim’s testimony is sufficient to sustain a conviction
• discrepancies between a witness’s trial testimony and earlier statements made to police and in depositions do not render such testimony incredibly dubious
• discrepancies between witness’s trial testimony and earlier statements do not render testimony incredibly dubious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).