Skip to main content
· 7/30/2008

Mamou v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.

Citations

  • 165 Cal. App. 4th 686
  • 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1165
  • 104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to state a FEHA claim based on an adverse employment action, a 7 plaintiff must plead facts that show both damage to the employee and a causal link between the 8 adverse action and the damage
  • identifying a triable issue of material fact as to actual malice based on “evidence from which a factfinder could reasonably infer that the authors of at least some of the defamatory statements knew they were false when made.”
  • elements of a FEHA retaliation claim
  • elements of a FEHA retaliation claim
  • elements of a FEHA retaliation claim
  • noting similar elements under FEHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rushing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.