Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “claim of reputational harm” must be connected with “a specific allegation of wrongful conduct”
• finding that while Section 230(c)(2) has a good-faith 19 requirement, (c)(1) has no such requirement
• noting that, after the 4 Supreme Court’s decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. 5 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007
• reviewing case law reading “Enmons as holding only that the use of violence to secure legitimate collective bargaining objectives is beyond the reach of the Hobbs Act”
• stating that evaluating pleadings 5 involves a “two-step process”
• applying United States v. Sturm , 870 F.2d 769 , 771-72 (1st Cir. 1989), and finding Hobbs Act extortion would be proved if defendant made wrongful threats of economic injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).