Skip to main content
· 8/25/1999

Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

Citations

  • 735 A.2d 1039
  • 355 Md. 488
  • 1999 Md. LEXIS 488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the relationship between H & R Block and its customers for the preparation of tax returns was that of principal-agent
  • holding that the rela- tionship between H&R Block and its customers for the preparation of tax returns was that of principal-agent
  • holding that under Maryland law, a claim for fraudulent concealment requires, among other elements, that plaintiff establish that “the defendant intended to defraud or deceive plaintiff”
  • holding that there was no basis for imposing vicarious liability on a corporate official for the tortious conduct of a co-employee when the official was serving in a managerial capacity and did not engage in any affirmative conduct
  • holding that Maryland courts “consider[] three characteristics as having particular relevance to the determination of the existence of a principal-agent relationship: (1) the agent’s power to alter the legal relations of the principal; (2
  • explaining that an agent is a fiduciary to his principal within the scope of the agency relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.