P. Flanigan & Sons, Inc. v. Childs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the existence of an agency relationship is ordinarily a question of fact
• declaring that the existence of an agency relationship is ordinarily a question of fact
• affirming trial court’s grant of motion for JNOV because “[i]t is common knowledge ... that possession of [building plans] is of itself not manifestation of an agency.”
• no contract between subcontractor and owner even though subcontractor possessed site plan identifying owner and subcontractor was informed details of construction would be discussed with owners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).