Skip to main content
· 8/5/1988

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,878 Jane W. Hofherr and Robert A. Hofherr v. Dart Industries, Inc., and Eli Lilly & Company

Citations

  • 853 F.2d 259
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10649
  • 1988 WL 80817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying learned intermediary doctrine to affirm directed verdict in pharmacist’s favor on duty to warn claim where “only danger would result” from requiring “that the physician by second-guessed by the pharmacist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Chapman, Haynsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.