Grayson v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is appropriate to turn to both California and federal cases for guidance in interpreting the [DC]FCA”
• describing the various interpretations by different circuits of the language \based upon\
• “‘[W]hile a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grayson v. AT & T CORP.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 139×
• Saunders v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-06· cited 4×
• DARRELL JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-08-11· cited 4×
• Hicks v. Dist. of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 3×
• Beck v. TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
  District of Columbia· 2010-01-27· cited 1×
• Phone Recovery Services v. Verizon Washington DC, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-16· cited 1×
• Sloan v. Urban Title Services, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2010-02-12
• National Consumers League v. General Mills, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2010-01-15
• Hicks v. District of Columbia Office of the Inspector General
  District of Columbia· 2016-04-28
• Hicks v. District of Columbia Office of the Inspector General
  District of Columbia· 2018-03-30
• Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-09-02
• Katz v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-12-15

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Papasan v. Allain
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
• Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-03-27· cited 664×
• United States Ex Rel. Vuyyuru v. Jadhav
  Fourth Circuit· 2009-02-12· cited 378×
• United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. Quinn
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-04-08· cited 374×
• Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-09-17· cited 312×
• United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 298×
• United States Ex Rel. Hafter v. Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-09-07· cited 229×
• Herbert Cooper, United States of America, Ex Rel v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-04-21· cited 221×
• Glaser v. Wound Care Consultants, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 168×
• Norman I. Gold v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Black River Constructors, Fort Drum Constructors, and National Structures, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1995-10-23· cited 121×
• Murray v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-07-17· cited 100×
• United States of America Ex Rel. Harold R. Fine v. Sandia Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, United States of America, Amicus Curiae
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-11-21· cited 86×
• United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-11-03· cited 70×
• United States Ex Rel. Fine v. MK-Ferguson Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-11-06· cited 62×
• City of Pomona v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-06-29· cited 54×
• Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-06· cited 43×
• Tuten v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-10· cited 43×
• Clampitt v. American University
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-09-25· cited 42×