Skip to main content
· 9/17/2009

Grayson v. AT & T CORP.

Citations

  • 980 A.2d 1137
  • 140 A.3d 1155
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 460
  • 2009 WL 2957812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “it is appropriate to turn to both California and federal cases for guidance in interpreting the [DC]FCA”
  • describing the various interpretations by different circuits of the language \based upon\
  • “‘[W]hile a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid and Kramer, Associate Judges, and Belson, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.