United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ‘‘based upon’’ in the False Claims Act does not mean based ‘‘solely’’ upon
• holding that relator is not an original source as to information produced during discovery
• holding that the fact that the contractor had fully disclosed all information to the Government may show that the contractor did not “knowingly” submit a false claim
• holding that discovery material contained in unsealed court records was \publicly disclosed\
• holding that discovery material contained in unsealed court records was “publicly disclosed”
• concluding that plaintiff, who performed collateral research and possessed background information which enabled him to understand the significance of publicly disclosed information, did not qualify as an original source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).