Skip to main content
· 9/17/1992

Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc Corporation

Citations

  • 975 F.2d 1412
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7885
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 12858
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,413
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1256
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22067
  • 1992 WL 224614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the relator 15 “ha[d] no evidence that [the defendant] committed anything more than ‘innocent mistakes’ 16 or ‘negligence,’ if that”
  • holding that in order to be deemed an \original source\ a person must have voluntarily provided the information on which his allegations are based to the government prior to filing a qui tam action
  • holding that an engineer- relator who had been called in to study a problem with a product had “direct” knowledge because “he saw [the problem] with his own eyes” and his knowledge was “unmediated by anything but [his] own labor”
  • noting that the restrictive interpretation that barred suits by original sources was \too much for Congress\
  • noting that the restrictive interpretation that barred suits by original sources was “too much for Congress”
  • explaining that the concern in a false claims case is with uncovering fraud, not errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Poole, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.