Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 9/30/1988

Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Citations

  • 858 F.2d 610
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13594
  • 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 67
  • 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,345
  • 1988 WL 100388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when “the employment relationship ends . . . the reasons for allowing employees to claim a continuing discriminatory policy are removed”
  • tolling statute of limitations where defendant was “fully apprised” of the plaintiffs’ claims and did not show “significant prejudice” from allowing plaintiffs to proceed
  • noting defendant had not shown any significant prejudice would result should plaintiffs be allowed to proceed with ADEA claims despite filing EEOC charges beyond 180-day statutory time period
  • discussing the same standard for both Title VII and the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Holloway, McKay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.