David Hulsey, and Gary Davis v. Kmart, Inc., a Michigan Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that statute of limitations began to run when plaintiff learned he was demoted and transferred, not when he learned that employment decisions may have been motivated by age discrimination
• deciding that statute of limitations began to run when plaintiff learned he was demoted and transferred, not when he learned that employment decisions may have been motivated by age discrimination
• explaining that an “occurrence” refers to the date on which the employer announces the adverse employment decision
• explaining that motions to disqualify in federal court affect substantive rights of the parties and are “decided by standards developed under federal law”
• explaining that it is not necessary for the claimant to possess all of the evidence upon which the claim of discrimination relies in order to file a charge with the EEOC
• refusing to toll statute of limitations period because plaintiff had a “duty to determine whether there was, in fact, a discriminatory motivation” for the adverse job action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).