E.D. Michigan· 1/27/2005

Gratz v. Bollinger

Citations

353 F. Supp. 2d 929
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1104
2005 WL 195382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

permitting recovery for only 55 out of 323.50 hours billed by local counsel because “most of [local counsel’s] billing entries reflect time spent ‘receiving and reviewing’ materials” created or already reviewed by other attorneys
“Plaintiffs should not be compensated for the hours their attorneys expended on media and public relations efforts”
“[T]he Court does not believe that § 1988 contemplates an award of fees related to an attorneys’ search for clients who will serve as model plaintiffs.”
“[T]he Court does not believe that § 1988 contemplates an award of fees related to an attorneys’ search for clients who will serve as model plaintiffs.”
“[T]here is nothing inherently unreasonable about making an award for time spent by two or more lawyers engaged in the same representation . . . ”
computerized research costs awarded but reduction made based on costs being “exhorbitant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.