· 12/21/2000
Hopwood v. State of Texas
Citations
- 236 F.3d 256
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33523
- 2000 WL 1868233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \the district court properly accounted for the Plaintiffs' lack of success in obtaining monetary and other direct relief by reducing their attorneys' submitted hourly totals\
- affirming district court’s reduction of attorneys’ fees by twenty-five percent, as fee applicant did not exercise adequate billing judgment
- “Appellate courts have only a limited opportunity to appreciate the complexity of trying any given case and the level of professional skill needed to prosecute it.”
- “Plaintiffs elected to oppose intervention and they were successful—but not against Texas: They succeeded against the putative intervenors in a case instituted by Plaintiffs, not by Texas.”
- once a court determines that a plaintiff is entitled to fees, it must determine the appropriate amount to be awarded
- “Appellate courts have only a limited opportunity to appreciate the complexity of trying any given case and the level of professional skill needed to prosecute it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Stewart, Little
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.