Skip to main content
· 12/21/2000

Hopwood v. State of Texas

Citations

  • 236 F.3d 256
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33523
  • 2000 WL 1868233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \the district court properly accounted for the Plaintiffs' lack of success in obtaining monetary and other direct relief by reducing their attorneys' submitted hourly totals\
  • affirming district court’s reduction of attorneys’ fees by twenty-five percent, as fee applicant did not exercise adequate billing judgment
  • “Appellate courts have only a limited opportunity to appreciate the complexity of trying any given case and the level of professional skill needed to prosecute it.”
  • “Plaintiffs elected to oppose intervention and they were successful—but not against Texas: They succeeded against the putative intervenors in a case instituted by Plaintiffs, not by Texas.”
  • once a court determines that a plaintiff is entitled to fees, it must determine the appropriate amount to be awarded
  • “Appellate courts have only a limited opportunity to appreciate the complexity of trying any given case and the level of professional skill needed to prosecute it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Stewart, Little

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.