Governale v. Lieberman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding A.R.S. § 12-2604 against special-law challenge because it “applies uniformly to all members of the classes of 7 COLEMAN v. AMON Opinion of the Court health care providers and to persons suing them”
• statute limiting potential expert witnesses a plaintiff may use “does not abolish the right to bring a medical malpractice action and thus is not an abrogation”
• statute limiting potential expert witnesses a plaintiff may use did not effectively abrogate plaintiffs right of recovery even if, from plaintiffs perspective, it weakened his case by preventing him from using his chosen expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).