State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a statute abolishing joint and several liability in strict products liability cases did not violate the anti-abrogation clause because “the claimant remains entirely free to bring his claim against all responsible parties”
• rejecting argument that A.R.S. § 12-2506, which abolished joint and several liability in strict products liability cases violates Article 18, Section 6
• \[W]e are not free to engraft further exceptions into the law simply because we might favor them as a matter of policy.\
• “[W]e are not free to engraft further exceptions into the law simply because we might favor them as a matter of policy.”
• “The mere purchase of a product 27 from a supplier does not establish a master-servant or principal-agent relationship between 28 the buyer and seller.”
• “[I]ndemnification is not at all inconsistent with apportionment of fault under § 12–2506.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).