Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that UCATA’s retaining joint and several liability for certain classes of defendants rationally furthered the state’s interest in promoting fairness
• noting courts may consider \either the actual basis on which the legislature acted or any hypothetical basis on which it might have acted.\
• “A party to an action does not have a vested right in a particular remedy or mode of procedure.”
• “Social and economic legislation that does not involve a suspect classification or a fundamental right will be upheld when it is rationally related to a legitimate government purpose.”
• “Since the composition of the court changed between the time that Humana Hospital and Bryant were decided, and has changed again since Bryant, this question may still be an open one.”
• existence of other means does not render law unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).