Skip to main content

Grimes v. State

Citations

  • 678 S.E.2d 167
  • 297 Ga. App. 720
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1654
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that since the defendant’s appeal was pending when the Garza decision was issued, it was in the “pipeline” and the Garza test applied
  • reversing defendant’s kidnapping conviction based upon insufficient evidence of asportation, since the movement of the victim was an inherent part of the robbery and was not an independent wrong
  • movement of victim from front of restaurant to money cabinet in back office, then to front cash register
  • defendant forced victim into an office to unlock cabinet then out of office to cash register to open it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington, Johnson, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.