Goodman v. Harbor Market, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the injury caused by the event need not have occurred or been discovered before the statute of repose bars the action
• holding that the injury caused by the event need not have occurred or been discovered before the statute of repose bars the action
• finding date plaintiff was sued due to attorney’s alleged negligence to be date plaintiffs cause of action accrued, where that was the “undisputed date” of discovery
• applying the six-year statute-of-repose period as the reasonable period after the effective date of the statute of repose in which to file a legal malpractice claim
• applying the six-year statute-of-repose period as the reasonable period after the effective date of the statute of repose in which to file a legal malpractice claim
• applying the six-year statute-of-repose period as the reasonable period after the effective date of the statute of repose in which to file a legal malpractice claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).