Robert B. Kaplan v. Shure Brothers, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Arnold Weinberg, of Katz Randall & Weinberg, and Katz Randall & Weinberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• complaint alleging breach of warranty did not need to plead facts showing that the plaintiff satisfied the privity requirement, as long as he put the defendant on notice of the claim
• “In this case, a review of the district court’s orders convinces us that the court’s dismissal of Kaplan’s action on February 14, 1997 is an appealable order.”
• “Under Illinois law, a cause of action based on a contract may only be brought by a party to that contract or someone in privity with that party.”
• appellate court had jurisdic tion even though minute order stated that case was dismissed without prejudice, where record read as a whole evidenced clear intent to end the entire case
• no amendment to complaint possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).