Skip to main content
· 2/19/2002

Sorenson v. LAW OFFICES OF POEHLMANN

Citations

  • 764 N.E.2d 1227
  • 327 Ill. App. 3d 706
  • 262 Ill. Dec. 110
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the continued existence of the attorney-client relationship after the acts or omissions alleged to have caused injury has no affect on the repose period
  • continued existence of attorney-client relationship after preparation of allegedly defective antenuptial agreement did not affect starting point of period of repose
  • “a statute of repose is not related to the accrual of any cause of action”
  • the continued existence of the attorney-client relationship after the acts or omissions alleged to have caused injury has no affect on the repose period
  • continued existence of attorney-client relationship after preparation of allegedly defective antenuptial agreement did not affect starting point of period of repose
  • \a statute of repose is unrelated to the accrual of any cause of action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.