Frohs v. Greene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On a theoretical basis it is impossible to justify the applicability of the discovery rule to one kind of malpractice and not to another.”
• adverse effects would not necessarily put the plaintiff on notice of tortious conduct by the defendant
• statements by physicians considered in assessing whether the plaintiff had discovered claim
• discovery rule affords opportunity for plaintiff to discover that claim exists
• “Normally, knowl- edge of injury as a result of [the] defendants’ actions would put the injured party on sufficient notice of [the] defendants’ tortious conduct to commence the running of the statute.”
• “Normally, knowl- edge of injury as a result of [the] defendants’ actions would put the injured party on sufficient notice of [the] defendants’ tortious conduct to commence the running of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).