Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ALJ adequately articulated her reasoning where she “weave[d] supportability and consistency throughout her analysis of which doctors were persuasive”
• finding that the ALJ adequately articulated supportability and consistency factors where an opinion was “persuasive because it is consistent with the record”
• affirming an ALJ’s decision when the ALJ “weave[d] supportability and consistency throughout her analysis of which doctors were persuasive”
• finding an ALJ’s articulation sufficient as to the opinions of psychologists where the ALJ explained how the opinions “fit with other evidence”
• stating the regulations only require ALJs to discuss the supportability and consistency factors and explain dispositive reason(s) for their decisions
• finding an ALJ’s articulation sufficient as to the opinions of psychologists where the ALJ explained how the opinions “fit with other evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).