Goel v. RAMACHANDRAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]ven applying Beiser’s broad conception of ‘relates to,’” defendant had failed to show that removal was' proper
• affirming state court’s confirmation of an arbitral award under the Convention
• action not related to arbitration proceedings even if those proceedings “determine[d] some issues that would also be relevant to [the case]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).