Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that domination is required to pierce the corporate veil
• stating that piercing the corporate veil requires a showing that: (1) the owner exercised complete domination over the corporation with respect to the transaction attacked, and (2
• “[P]iercing the corporate veil requires a showing that: (1) the owners exercised complete domination of the corporation in respect to the transaction attacked; and (2
• noting veil piercing “is an assertion of facts and circumstances which will persuade the court to impose the corporate obligation on its owners”
• finding there can be no piercing of the corporate veil where there is no corporate obligation to be imposed
• finding there can be no piercing of the corporate veil where there is no corporate obligation to be imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).